Welcome to the Fall Classic Invitational! We’re excited to host your students for a full day of Individual Events at Novi High School on Saturday, October 3.
Doors open at 7:15 AM. Coaches, please check in when you arrive; judges, please be ready by 7:45 AM. Room assignments go up on this page the evening before the meet.
Questions before the day? Reach out using the contacts below. We’re happy to help.
Day-of Schedule
7:15 AMDoors open · Check-in
7:40 AMCoaches meeting
2:45 PMAwards
4:30 PMPrelim 1
5:00 PMPrelim 2
5:30 PMPrelim 3
Schematic
Room assignments and speaking order for every posted round. Competitors appear by code (last names optional, no schools); school affiliations publish with the results.
What each one is, and how long you have. The same rules and time limits the judges here will be reading.
19 events in 4 groups
Grades 9–10 Dramatic Interpretation and Sales Speaking each have a separate field for 9th and 10th graders, listed under the event.
Public Address 4
▶Informative Speaking5:00–8:00
An informative speech is an original presentation designed to clearly explain, define, or illustrate a particular subject. Because the basic purpose of the speech is to inform, material that is argumentative, persuasive, or entertaining may be used only to illustrate, enliven, or clarify the information the speaker presents.
Judged on Oral Presentation · Action and Platform Conduct · Visual aids
The full ballot text
Concept of Event: An informative speech is an original presentation designed to clearly explain, define, or illustrate a particular subject. Because the basic purpose of the speech is to inform, material that is argumentative, persuasive, or entertaining may be used only to illustrate, enliven, or clarify the information the speaker presents.
The purpose of an informative speech is to secure understanding. The topic should be suitable for the audience, yet reflect originality. A good informative speech is developed through organization, amplification, clarity, and interest. Supporting material should be presented in a logical manner designed to maintain a high level of interest for the listener.
BASIS FOR DECISION
Oral Presentation: The delivery of the speech should be enthusiastic, direct, sincere, and communicative. The speaker should give the impression of genuineness without affectation in attitude, manner, or appearance. The speaker's delivery should be effective in enlisting and holding the interest of the audience. The speaker may deliver the speech from a manuscript, memory, an outline, or any combination thereof.
Action and Platform Conduct: The speaker should exhibit personality, maintain direct eye contact with the audience, show physical poise, and demonstrate freedom in posture, movement, and gesture. Prompting from the audience is not allowed and could be the basis for disqualification.
Script requirements: Contestants must have a manuscript or an outline available for a judge to review in the round if requested. Contestants must use proper documentation of all source material used in the manuscript or outline. The manuscript or outline must include directly quoted material and/or paraphrased material, which is used in the speech. Plagiarism, the failure to provide accurate credit to the author(s) of directly quoted material or paraphrased material, is a serious offense and is a basis for disqualification. The script may be a hard copy or an electronic version on a device that can be made available to the judge in the round. A judge request for a contestant’s script must be made within the time frame of the round of competition. Should a judge need more extensive review time, the judge should make arrangements through tournament officials and the contestant’s coach.
Visual aids: The speaker may wish to incorporate the use of visual aids, audiovisual projections, or demonstrations. A demonstration is defined as the actual operation of a piece of equipment, an object, a device, or a process. Visual/audio aids should supplement the presentation and should not be the major focus of the speech. The use of visual aids, audiovisual projections, or demonstrations should not interfere with the speaker's communicative contact with audience. Only one easel or electronic display monitor may be used. No other display equipment is allowed. Set-up time is limited to two minutes.
▶Oratory5:00–8:00
An oration is an original, persuasive speech. The oration may eulogize a person, alert the audience to a threatening danger, strengthen the devotion of the audience to an accepted cause, or present a solution to a problem.
Judged on Oral Presentation · Action and Platform Conduct · Visual aids
The full ballot text
Concept of Event: An oration is an original, persuasive speech. The oration may eulogize a person, alert the audience to a threatening danger, strengthen the devotion of the audience to an accepted cause, or present a solution to a problem.
The topic should be suitable for the audience, yet reflect originality. A good oration is developed through organization, amplification, clarity, and interest.
BASIS FOR DECISION
Oral Presentation: The delivery of the speech should be enthusiastic, direct, sincere, and communicative. The speaker should give the impression of genuineness without affectation in attitude, manner, or appearance. The speaker's delivery should be effective in enlisting and holding the interest of the audience. The speaker may deliver the speech from a manuscript, memory, an outline, or any combination thereof.
Action and Platform Conduct: The speaker should exhibit personality, maintain direct eye contact with the audience, show physical poise, and demonstrate freedom in posture, movement, and gesture. Prompting from the audience is not allowed and could be the basis for disqualification.
▶Sales Speaking5:00–8:00
A sales speech combines informative and persuasive techniques to encourage members of the immediate audience to respond favorably to the appeal. The sales speaker should carefully analyze the audience and develop an appropriate persuasive message for an actual product or service. The sales speaker should not invent the product or service, or the intended consumer.
Judged on Oral Presentation · Action and Platform Conduct · Visual aids
The full ballot text
Concept of Event: A sales speech combines informative and persuasive techniques to encourage members of the immediate audience to respond favorably to the appeal. The sales speaker should carefully analyze the audience and develop an appropriate persuasive message for an actual product or service. The sales speaker should not invent the product or service, or the intended consumer.
The topic should be suitable for the audience, yet reflect originality. A good sales speech is developed through organization, amplification, clarity, and interest.
BASIS FOR DECISION
Oral Presentation: The delivery of the speech should be enthusiastic, direct, sincere, and communicative. The speaker should give the impression of genuineness without affectation in attitude, manner, or appearance. The speaker's delivery should be effective in enlisting and holding the interest of the audience. The speaker may deliver the speech from a manuscript, memory, an outline, or any combination thereof.
Limited preparation 4
▶Broadcastingup to 5:00
The purpose of this event is to familiarize the contestant with the important medium of broadcasting and to test the ability of the participant to read with authority, intelligence, and audience appeal while understanding the necessity of visual communication with the audience. The contestant will also engage in a satisfactory analysis and synthesis of news items through broadcasting, including a one-minute editorial.
Judged on Oral Presentation · Action and Platform Conduct
The full ballot text
Concept of Event: The purpose of this event is to familiarize the contestant with the important medium of broadcasting and to test the ability of the participant to read with authority, intelligence, and audience appeal while understanding the necessity of visual communication with the audience. The contestant will also engage in a satisfactory analysis and synthesis of news items through broadcasting, including a one-minute editorial.
The broadcast should be a factual and accurate presentation of recent news. Consideration should be given to the organization of the prepared copy with the emphasis on announcing techniques and the editorial. The broadcaster should provide a clear transition to identify the editorial, which may be placed at any point in the broadcast. The suggested time limit for the editorial is one minute, not inclusive of the time spent reading the news story upon which the editorial is based. The substance of the editorial should reflect an understanding of the issue and should suggest an analytical judgment.
Interpretation 8
▶Dramatic Interpretation5:00–8:00
Dramatic Interpretation is the presentation of a serious or humorous selection from a play written for either the stage or the electronic media. The cutting may be from a single selection of literature or a compilation. Adaptations of works from other genres (adaptations of poems, novels, or short stories) that are written for performance on the stage or in an electronic medium (radio, film, television) are permitted. In dramatic interpretation, a character developed in depth in a monologue is equally acceptable as a multiple character performance.
Judged on Quality of literature · Physical performance · Vocal performance · Total effect
The full ballot text
Concept of Event: Dramatic Interpretation is the presentation of a serious or humorous selection from a play written for either the stage or the electronic media. The cutting may be from a single selection of literature or a compilation. Adaptations of works from other genres (adaptations of poems, novels, or short stories) that are written for performance on the stage or in an electronic medium (radio, film, television) are permitted. In dramatic interpretation, a character developed in depth in a monologue is equally acceptable as a multiple character performance.
GUIDELINES FOR INTERPRETATION EVENTS
Special 3
▶Poetry Slamup to 3:00
Students perform their original poetry in a spoken-word competition evaluated by 5 judges (scored on a scale of 1-10, using one decimal point). Poems must be no longer than 3 minutes. Students may not use any props, stools, or musical accompaniment. Poems and physical actions must still comply with the Standards For Performance. The high and low score will be dropped and the three remaining scores will be added together to determine the poet's score for the round. There will be a .5 deduction for each 10 seconds the poem goes over 3 minutes, with a 10-second grace period. This means that the penalty goes into effect at 3:11. All participants need to be prepared with a minimum of 3 poems, as students may not repeat poems and will need a third poem if they qualify for the final round. There will be 2 preliminary rounds of slam, so each poet will read at least twice. Students will be placed in sections of 4-8 for each flight. There may be 2 or more flights of slammers in each round. The final round will take place in the theatre during lunch. After finals, Slam participants will eat lunch and spend the remainder of the day participating in a writer's workshop.
▶Progressive Debate
In Progressive Debate individuals, as opposed to teams, debate, using the April NSDA Public Forum topic. There are 4 to 6 debaters in each round, who draw for order at the beginning of the round. Speaker one presents a short PRO constructive speech (2½ minutes). Speaker two, and each speaker after, may EITHER take 2 minutes of prep and then cross-examine the speaker before them for 2 minutes, OR cross-examine first and then take the prep — it is their choice. They then give a 5-minute speech: a CON rebuttal to the previous speaker's PRO (about 2½ minutes), then their own PRO constructive (about 2½ minutes). This continues until the last speaker has given their PRO. The first speaker then takes prep and cross-examines the last speaker, in either order, and closes with a CON rebuttal against them (2½ minutes). During prep, debaters may use notes, research and the internet, but may not contact any person. Evidence must be cited with at least its author or source and its date. Speakers are scored like an individual event: 1/100, 2/99, 3/98, 4/97. Judges are often lay judges with no special debate training.
Entry Fees
Fees are shown to coaches and other adults who are signed in. Sign in to see them.
Judging
Judge obligation1 judge per 5 entriesor fraction thereof
Fees are shown to coaches and other adults who are signed in. Sign in to see them.
Awards
Awards follow the last round. Every finalist is recognized, and the team sweepstakes trophy is presented at the end.
Frequently asked questions
How many judges does each school bring?
One judge for every 5 entries. A school that brings fewer pays the hired-judge fee for each one it’s missing.
Can students judge?
No. Every judge at this meet is an adult.
What if a student can’t come?
Drop them from your registration sheet. Drops after registration closes carry the standard MIFA drop fee.
Where do we find room assignments?
Right here. The schematic goes up on this page the evening before the meet, and any changes on the day appear here first.
Procedures that endanger the health and safety of the audience are prohibited. Live animals are not permitted. Caution should be used in distributing consumable products to an audience.
Timing: Each presentation must be timed. Timing starts when the presentation of the contestant begins. Either the judge or an alternate timekeeper, under the supervision of the judge, is responsible for using a stopwatch and for displaying time cards that are clearly visible to the contestant unless the performer prefers not to have visual timing. The number showing on the card should indicate the amount of time remaining. Judges should give an oral report of the actual time at the completion of each performance. Timing must be indicated on the ballot as well as on the contestants' critique sheets.
Presentations that do not conform to the suggested time parameters may be penalized at the discretion of the judge. Penalties are not mandatory for timing irregularities.
HIGH SCHOOL: Time limit for Informative Speaking in high school is five (5) minutes to eight (8) minutes.
MIDDLE LEVEL: Time limit for Informative Speaking in middle level is four (4) minutes to seven (7) minutes.
Contestant Evaluation: The ballot must be completely filled out and needs to include the contestant's name and code, the author, the rank, the percentage score, and the time of the presentation. Judges are to complete their ballots legibly.
Each judge shall rank the participants as 1,2,3, according to the relative merits of the contestants. All other contestants will receive a rank of 4. The judge shall also assign a percentage score ranging from 100 to 75. No two contestants can be given the same percentage.
All point scores must be assigned in whole integers. One hundred percent must be assigned to the best contestant with the points for all other contestants in the range of 99-75. The assignment of a score between 79-75 should be reserved for special circumstances; such as when a contestant fails to complete his or her presentation, exhibits inappropriate behavior, or performs highly inappropriate material.
Critique sheets and ballots must be returned to the ballot collection/tabulation room at the conclusion of each round.
Note: Please follow the instructions given at the judge’s meeting concerning speaking order. Some Invitational tournaments may draw in round. Regional & State Tournaments use the order as listed on the schematic.
Script requirements: Contestants must have a manuscript or an outline available for a judge to review in the round if requested. Supporting material should be presented in a logical manner designed to maintain a high level of interest for the listener. Contestants must use proper documentation of all source material used in the manuscript or outline. The manuscript or outline must include directly quoted material and/or paraphrased material, which is used in the speech. Plagiarism, the failure to provide accurate credit to the author(s) of directly quoted material or paraphrased material, is a serious offense and is a basis for disqualification. The script may be a hard copy or an electronic version on a device that can be made available to the judge in the round. A judge request for a contestant’s script must be made within the time frame of the round of competition. Should a judge need more extensive review time, the judge should make arrangements through tournament officials and the contestant’s coach.
Visual aids: The speaker may wish to incorporate the use of visual aids, audio/visual projections, or demonstrations. A demonstration is defined as the actual operation of a piece of equipment, an object, a device, or a process. Visual aids, audio/visual projections or demonstrations should supplement the presentation and should not be the major focus of the speech. The use of visual aids, audio/visual projections, or demonstrations should not interfere with the speaker's communicative contact with audience. Only one easel may be used. No other display equipment is allowed. Set-up time is limited to two minutes.
Procedures that endanger the health and safety of the viewers are prohibited. Live animals are not permitted. Caution should be used in distributing consumable products to an audience.
Visual aids, audio/visual projections or demonstrations are not allowed in Oratory for middle school tournaments.
Timing: Each presentation must be timed. Timing starts when the presentation of the contestant begins. Either the judge or an alternate timekeeper, under the supervision of the judge, is responsible for using a stopwatch and for displaying time cards that are clearly visible to the contestant unless the performer prefers not to have visual timing. The number showing on the card should indicate the amount of time remaining. Judges should give an oral report of the actual time at the completion of each performance. Timing must be indicated on the ballot as well as on the contestants' critique sheets.
Presentations that do not conform to the suggested time parameters may be penalized at the discretion of the judge. Penalties are not mandatory for timing irregularities.
HIGH SCHOOL: Time limit for Oratory in high school is five (5) minutes to eight (8) minutes.
MIDDLE LEVEL: Time limit for Oratory in middle level is four (4) minutes to seven (7) minutes.
Contestant Evaluation: The ballot must be completely filled out and needs to include the contestant's name and code, the author, the rank, the percentage score, and the time of the presentation. Judges are to complete their ballots legibly.
Each judge shall rank the participants as 1,2,3, according to the relative merits of the contestants. All other contestants will receive a rank of 4. The judge shall also assign a percentage score ranging from 100 to 75. No two contestants can be given the same percentage.
All point scores must be assigned in whole integers. One hundred percent must be assigned to the best contestant with the points for all other contestants in the range of 99-75. The assignment of a score between 79-75 should be reserved for special circumstances; such as when a contestant fails to complete his or her presentation, exhibits inappropriate behavior, or performs highly inappropriate material.
Critique sheets and ballots must be returned to the ballot collection/tabulation room at the conclusion of each round.
Note: Please follow the instructions given at the judge’s meeting concerning speaking order. Some Invitational tournaments may draw in round. Regional & State Tournaments use the order as listed on the schematic.
Action and Platform Conduct: The speaker should exhibit personality, maintain direct eye contact with the audience, show physical poise, and demonstrate freedom in posture, movement, and gesture. Prompting from the audience is not allowed and could be the basis for disqualification.
Script requirements: Contestants must have a manuscript or an outline available for a judge to review in the round if requested. Supporting material should be presented in a logical manner and contestants must use proper documentation of all source material used in the manuscript or outline. The manuscript or outline must include directly quoted material and/or paraphrased material, which is used in the speech. Plagiarism, the failure to provide accurate credit to the author(s) of directly quoted material or paraphrased material, is a serious offense and is a basis for disqualification. The script may be a hard copy or an electronic version on a device that can be made available to the judge in the round. A judge request for a contestant’s script must be made within the time frame of that round of competition. Should a judge need more extensive review time, the judge should make arrangements through tournament officials and the contestant’s coach.
Visual aids: The speaker may wish to incorporate the use of visual aids, audiovisual projections, or demonstrations. A demonstration is defined as the actual operation of a piece of equipment, an object, a device, or a process. Visual/audio aids should supplement the presentation and should not be the major focus of the speech. The use of visual aids, audiovisual projections, or demonstrations should not interfere with the speaker's communicative contact with audience. Only one easel or electronic display monitor may be used. No other display equipment is allowed. Set-up time is limited to two minutes.
Procedures that endanger the health and safety of the viewers are prohibited. Live animals are not permitted. Caution should be used in distributing consumable products to an audience.
Timing: Each presentation must be timed. Timing starts when the presentation of the contestant begins. Either the judge or an alternate timekeeper, under the supervision of the judge, is responsible for using a stopwatch and for displaying time cards that are clearly visible to the contestant unless the performer prefers not to have visual timing. The number showing on the card should indicate the amount of time remaining. Judges should give an oral report of the actual time at the completion of each performance. Timing must be indicated on the ballot as well as on the contestants' critique sheets.
Presentations that do not conform to the suggested time parameters may be penalized at the discretion of the judge. Penalties are not mandatory for timing irregularities.
HIGH SCHOOL: Time limit for Sales Speaking in high school is five (5) minutes to eight (8) minutes.
MIDDLE LEVEL: Time limit for Sales Speaking in middle level is four (4) minutes to seven (7) minutes.
Contestant Evaluation: The ballot must be completely filled out and needs to include the contestant's name and code, the author, the rank, the percentage score, and the time of the presentation. Judges are to complete their ballots legibly.
Each judge shall rank the participants as 1,2,3, according to the relative merits of the contestants. All other contestants will receive a rank of 4. The judge shall also assign a percentage score ranging from 100 to 75. No two contestants can be given the same percentage.
All point scores must be assigned in whole integers. One hundred percent must be assigned to the best contestant with the points for all other contestants in the range of 99-75. The assignment of a score between 79-75 should be reserved for special circumstances; such as when a contestant fails to complete his or her presentation, exhibits inappropriate behavior, or performs highly inappropriate material.
Critique sheets and ballots must be returned to the ballot collection/tabulation room at the conclusion of each round.
Note: Please follow the instructions given at the judge’s meeting concerning speaking order. Some Invitational tournaments may draw in round. Regional & State Tournaments use the order as listed on the schematic.
▶↳ Sales SpeakingGrades 9–105:00–8:00
A sales speech combines informative and persuasive techniques to encourage members of the immediate audience to respond favorably to the appeal. The sales speaker should carefully analyze the audience and develop an appropriate persuasive message for an actual product or service. The sales speaker should not invent the product or service, or the intended consumer.
Judged on Oral Presentation · Action and Platform Conduct · Visual aids
The full ballot text
Concept of Event: A sales speech combines informative and persuasive techniques to encourage members of the immediate audience to respond favorably to the appeal. The sales speaker should carefully analyze the audience and develop an appropriate persuasive message for an actual product or service. The sales speaker should not invent the product or service, or the intended consumer.
The topic should be suitable for the audience, yet reflect originality. A good sales speech is developed through organization, amplification, clarity, and interest.
BASIS FOR DECISION
Oral Presentation: The delivery of the speech should be enthusiastic, direct, sincere, and communicative. The speaker should give the impression of genuineness without affectation in attitude, manner, or appearance. The speaker's delivery should be effective in enlisting and holding the interest of the audience. The speaker may deliver the speech from a manuscript, memory, an outline, or any combination thereof.
Action and Platform Conduct: The speaker should exhibit personality, maintain direct eye contact with the audience, show physical poise, and demonstrate freedom in posture, movement, and gesture. Prompting from the audience is not allowed and could be the basis for disqualification.
Script requirements: Contestants must have a manuscript or an outline available for a judge to review in the round if requested. Supporting material should be presented in a logical manner and contestants must use proper documentation of all source material used in the manuscript or outline. The manuscript or outline must include directly quoted material and/or paraphrased material, which is used in the speech. Plagiarism, the failure to provide accurate credit to the author(s) of directly quoted material or paraphrased material, is a serious offense and is a basis for disqualification. The script may be a hard copy or an electronic version on a device that can be made available to the judge in the round. A judge request for a contestant’s script must be made within the time frame of that round of competition. Should a judge need more extensive review time, the judge should make arrangements through tournament officials and the contestant’s coach.
Visual aids: The speaker may wish to incorporate the use of visual aids, audiovisual projections, or demonstrations. A demonstration is defined as the actual operation of a piece of equipment, an object, a device, or a process. Visual/audio aids should supplement the presentation and should not be the major focus of the speech. The use of visual aids, audiovisual projections, or demonstrations should not interfere with the speaker's communicative contact with audience. Only one easel or electronic display monitor may be used. No other display equipment is allowed. Set-up time is limited to two minutes.
Procedures that endanger the health and safety of the viewers are prohibited. Live animals are not permitted. Caution should be used in distributing consumable products to an audience.
Timing: Each presentation must be timed. Timing starts when the presentation of the contestant begins. Either the judge or an alternate timekeeper, under the supervision of the judge, is responsible for using a stopwatch and for displaying time cards that are clearly visible to the contestant unless the performer prefers not to have visual timing. The number showing on the card should indicate the amount of time remaining. Judges should give an oral report of the actual time at the completion of each performance. Timing must be indicated on the ballot as well as on the contestants' critique sheets.
Presentations that do not conform to the suggested time parameters may be penalized at the discretion of the judge. Penalties are not mandatory for timing irregularities.
HIGH SCHOOL: Time limit for Sales Speaking in high school is five (5) minutes to eight (8) minutes.
MIDDLE LEVEL: Time limit for Sales Speaking in middle level is four (4) minutes to seven (7) minutes.
Contestant Evaluation: The ballot must be completely filled out and needs to include the contestant's name and code, the author, the rank, the percentage score, and the time of the presentation. Judges are to complete their ballots legibly.
Each judge shall rank the participants as 1,2,3, according to the relative merits of the contestants. All other contestants will receive a rank of 4. The judge shall also assign a percentage score ranging from 100 to 75. No two contestants can be given the same percentage.
All point scores must be assigned in whole integers. One hundred percent must be assigned to the best contestant with the points for all other contestants in the range of 99-75. The assignment of a score between 79-75 should be reserved for special circumstances; such as when a contestant fails to complete his or her presentation, exhibits inappropriate behavior, or performs highly inappropriate material.
Critique sheets and ballots must be returned to the ballot collection/tabulation room at the conclusion of each round.
Note: Please follow the instructions given at the judge’s meeting concerning speaking order. Some Invitational tournaments may draw in round. Regional & State Tournaments use the order as listed on the schematic.
Script Requirements: Contestants must have a manuscript available for a judge to review in the round if requested. Contestants must use proper documentation of all source material used in the manuscript. The script may be a hard copy or an electronic version on a device that can be made available to the judge. A judge request for a contestant’s script must be made within the time frame of the round of competition. Should a judge need more extensive review time, the judge should make arrangements through tournament officials.
Coaches should monitor and evaluate student sources to encourage the presentation of relevant news stories through verified factual information and the appreciation and use of news outlets that avoid political leanings.
Procedure: Contestants will prepare the news copy for their presentation prior to the tournament except for the editorial. The arrangement of current news stories should follow a coherent and organized manner to provide an informative presentation. The MIFA office will supply a distinct editorial story for Regional and State Final contests for every round at each level of competition. Editorial news stories provided should range between 150-250 words in total and should be chosen to provoke a wide variety of responses.
All contestants must use only the story that is made available by the Tournament Director for the editorial segment. The Tournament Director will also provide the judge(s) with the story selected for editorial commentary. The judge must return all editorial copies to the tabulation room with his or her ballot.
While original content is not allowed, students may synthesize material from multiple sources for each news story. Choice of editorial topic from outside the provided copy may result in the disqualification of the contestant from further competition; however, openings and closings for broadcasting may include the contestant's name and/or references to local conditions, such as weather and/or traffic conditions. Commercial content is not allowed. Original transitional phrases are acceptable and encouraged. In broadcasting, a transition is a phrase or sentence relating one news story to another news story
Prior to the receipt of the copy, the contestants may draw for or be assigned a presentation order [Speech Activities, Individual Events Activities: Presentation Order]. At eight-minute intervals, following the presentation order, each contestant receives the editorial copy. The contestant has fifteen minutes to cut, edit, write, and integrate the editorial copy into their five-minute broadcast. The contestant may use appropriate resource material (including personal technology) to assist in the preparation of the broadcast; however, the content of the editorial must reflect the words of the broadcaster. The use of technology to confer with external sources is prohibited. Furthermore, the use of pre-written editorials will result in disqualification.
There shall be no communication between contestants during their entire preparation time. The person in charge of the preparation room may dismiss a contestant from the contest if the contestant persists in talking or if the use of personal electronic technology is disruptive. Contestants should not enter the competition room while another speaker is presenting. Entering a room during a broadcast could result in the disqualification of the offending contestant. Following the broadcast, the participant must remain in the contest room until the conclusion of the section unless otherwise indicated by the tournament director. A contestant who leaves the contest room following his or her presentation may be disqualified from further participation in the particular tournament, or a rank of four with no percentage points could be assigned to the contestant for the round in which the individual left the contest room following his or her broadcast.
BASIS FOR DECISION
Oral Presentation: The delivery of the speech should be enthusiastic, direct, sincere, and communicative. The speaker should give the impression of genuineness without affectation in attitude, manner, or appearance. The speaker's delivery should be effective in enlisting and holding the interest of the audience. The speaker may deliver the speech from a manuscript, memory, an outline, or any combination thereof.
Action and Platform Conduct: The speaker should exhibit personality, maintain direct eye contact with the audience, show physical poise, and demonstrate freedom in posture, movement, and gesture. Prompting from the audience is not allowed and could be the basis for disqualification.
Timing: Each presentation must be timed. Timing starts when the presentation by the contestant begins. Either the judge or an alternate timekeeper, under the supervision of the judge, is responsible for using a timing device and for displaying time cards that are clearly visible to the contestant unless the performer prefers not to have visual timing. The number showing on the card should indicate the amount of time remaining. Judges should give an oral report of the actual time at the completion of each performance. Timing must be indicated on the ballot as well as on the contestants' critique sheets.
Presentations that do not conform to the suggested time parameters may be penalized at the discretion of the judge. Penalties are not mandatory for timing irregularities.
HIGH SCHOOL: The Time Limit for Broadcasting in high school is five minutes.
Contestant Evaluation: The ballot must be completely filled out and needs to include the contestant's name and code, the author, the rank, the percentage score, and the time of the presentation. Judges are to complete their ballots legibly. Prior to the completion of the ballot, any potential rule violations should be brought to the attention of tournament administration.
Each judge shall rank the participants as 1,2,3, according to the relative merits of the contestants. All other contestants will receive a rank of 4. The judge shall also assign a percentage score ranging from 100 to 75. No two contestants can be given the same percentage.
All point scores must be assigned in whole integers. One hundred percent must be assigned to the best contestant with the points for all other contestants in the range of 99-75. The assignment of a score between 79- 75 should be reserved for special circumstances; such as when a contestant fails to complete his or her presentation, exhibits inappropriate behavior, or performs highly inappropriate material.
Critique sheets and ballots must be returned to the collection/tabulation room at the conclusion of each round.
Note: Please follow the instructions given at the judge’s meeting concerning speaking order. Some Invitational tournaments may draw in round. Regional & State Tournaments use the order as listed on the schematic.
▶Duo Commentary4:00–7:00
The purpose of Duo Commentary speaking is for two students to work together to provide perspective on a given topic. Topics for Duo Commentary are often vague and/or utilize unique wording/phrasing. Students should explore the prompt thoroughly, defending their points with analysis and supporting material. Students must present from a seated position. During the process of the speech, the speakers may only use notes made during the one-half hour preparation time preceding the time of speaking. Topics may be on any subject but must be presented as plain text.
Judged on Oral Presentation · Action and Platform Conduct
The full ballot text
Concept of Event: The purpose of Duo Commentary speaking is for two students to work together to provide perspective on a given topic. Topics for Duo Commentary are often vague and/or utilize unique wording/phrasing. Students should explore the prompt thoroughly, defending their points with analysis and supporting material. Students must present from a seated position. During the process of the speech, the speakers may only use notes made during the one-half hour preparation time preceding the time of speaking. Topics may be on any subject but must be presented as plain text.
Procedure: The MIFA office will supply specific Commentary speaking topics for regional and state tournament rounds. The Tournament Director supplies topics. Judge(s) receive a copy of the topics for Duo Commentary and the list of speakers in order from the Prep Room. Each round will have a different theme. These themes will be made available at least 24 hours before the start of a tournament. Each duo will draw a total of three topics from a beginning field of 10. The contestants will then choose one of those three topics to speak on. Contestants may use physical or digital means to research for their presentation but must not confer with individuals outside of their duo.
After preparation, the judge and contestants should follow this process:
1. The person in charge of the commentary drawing will provide a master sheet for the judge(s) in each round with the code number of each duo by the appropriate topic. Each duo should give the chosen topic to the judge prior to the presentation. Only one duo per section may speak on a particular topic.
2. Following the presentation, the participants must remain in the contest room until the conclusion of the section unless otherwise indicated by the tournament director. A contestant who leaves the room following their presentation, without permission, may be assigned a rank of four with no percentage points and/or disqualified from further participation in the particular tournament.
3. The judge must return all copies of the commentary speaking topics to the tabulation room with his or her ballot.
BASIS FOR DECISION
Oral Presentation: Speaking time between the two contestants should be balanced and not dominated by one speaker. The delivery of the speech should be enthusiastic, direct, sincere, and communicative. The speakers' delivery should give the impression of genuineness, professionalism, and persuasive argumentation. The speakers’ delivery should be effective in enlisting and holding the interest of the audience. The speakers may deliver the speech from a manuscript, memory, an outline, or any combination thereof. Digital notes are permitted.
Action and Platform Conduct: The speakers should exhibit personality, maintain direct eye contact with the audience, and show physical poise. Contestants may look at each other or make physical contact during the speech but contact should be limited and not dominate the presentation. Prompting from the audience is not allowed and could be the basis for disqualification.
Timing: Each presentation must be timed. Either the judge or an alternate timekeeper, under the supervision of the judge, is responsible for using a stopwatch and for displaying time cards that are clearly visible to the contestant unless the performer prefers not to have visual timing. The number showing on the card should indicate the amount of time remaining. Judges should give an oral report of the actual time at the completion of each performance. Timing must be indicated on the ballot as well as on the contestants' critique sheets. Presentations that do not conform to the suggested time parameters may be penalized at the discretion of the judge. Penalties are not mandatory for timing irregularities.
HIGH SCHOOL: Time limit for Duo Commentary in high school is four (4) minutes to seven (7) minutes.
Contestant Evaluation: The ballot must be completely filled out and needs to include the contestants’ name and code, topic, the rank, the percentage score, and the time of the presentation. Judges are to complete their ballots legibly.
Each judge shall rank the participants as 1,2,3, according to the relative merits of the entries. All other entries will receive a rank of 4. The judge shall also assign a percentage score ranging from 100 to 75. No two entries can be given the same percentage.
All point scores must be assigned in whole integers. One hundred percent must be assigned to the best contestant with the points for all other contestants in the range of 99-75. The assignment of a score between 79-75 should be reserved for special circumstances; such as when a duo fails to complete their presentation, exhibits inappropriate behavior, or performs highly inappropriate material.
Critique sheets and ballots must be returned to the ballot collection/tabulation room at the conclusion of each round.
Note: Please follow the instructions given at the judge’s meeting concerning speaking order. Regionals & State Finals use the order as listed on the schematic.
▶Extemporaneous Speaking4:00–7:00
The purpose of Extemporaneous speaking is to encourage an interest in current issues and to provide practice in extemporaneous speaking. The student is expected to base remarks on factual material and interpret these facts in the light of personal experience and thinking. To be successful the contestant must endeavor to offer a unique approach to the question posed. During the process of the speech, the speaker may only use notes made during the one-half hour preparation time preceding the time of speaking.
Judged on Oral Presentation · Action and Platform Conduct
The full ballot text
Concept of Event: The purpose of Extemporaneous speaking is to encourage an interest in current issues and to provide practice in extemporaneous speaking. The student is expected to base remarks on factual material and interpret these facts in the light of personal experience and thinking. To be successful the contestant must endeavor to offer a unique approach to the question posed. During the process of the speech, the speaker may only use notes made during the one-half hour preparation time preceding the time of speaking.
Procedure: The MIFA office will supply specific extemporaneous speaking topics for regional and state tournaments. The Tournament Director supplies topics invitational tournaments. Judge(s) receive a copy of the topics for extemporaneous speaking and the list of speakers in order from the Prep Room.
Topics for the state elimination series will consist of questions on current events as of January 1, of state, national, and international political and social issues. Preliminary rounds will alternate between national and international issues. Each semifinal and final round will include topics from both national and international issues.
After preparation, the judge and contestants should follow this process:
1. The person in charge of the extemporaneous drawing will provide a master sheet for the judge(s) in each round with the code number of each contestant by the appropriate topic. Each contestant should give the chosen topic to the judge prior to the presentation. Only one contestant per section may speak on a particular topic.
2. Following the presentation, the participant must remain in the contest room until the conclusion of the section unless otherwise indicated by the tournament director. A contestant who leaves the room following their presentation may be assigned a rank of four with no percentage points and/or disqualified from further participation in the particular tournament.
3. The judge must return all copies of the extemporaneous speaking questions to the tabulation room with his or her ballot.
BASIS FOR DECISION
Oral Presentation: The delivery of the speech should be enthusiastic, direct, sincere, and communicative. The speaker should give the impression of genuineness without affectation in attitude, manner, or appearance. The speaker's delivery should be effective in enlisting and holding the interest of the audience. The speaker may deliver the speech from a manuscript, memory, an outline, or any combination thereof.
Action and Platform Conduct: The speaker should exhibit personality, maintain direct eye contact with the audience, show physical poise, and demonstrate freedom in posture, movement, and gesture. Prompting from the audience is not allowed and could be the basis for disqualification.
Timing: Each presentation must be timed. Timing starts when the presentation by the contestant begins. Either the judge or an alternate timekeeper, under the supervision of the judge, is responsible for using a stopwatch and for displaying time cards that are clearly visible to the contestant unless the performer prefers not to have visual timing. The number showing on the card should indicate the amount of time remaining. Judges should give an oral report of the actual time at the completion of each performance. Timing must be indicated on the ballot as well as on the contestants' critique sheets.
Presentations that do not conform to the suggested time parameters may be penalized at the discretion of the judge. Penalties are not mandatory for timing irregularities.
HIGH SCHOOL: Time limit for Extemporaneous in high school is four (4) minutes to seven (7) minutes.
MIDDLE LEVEL: Time limit for Extemporaneous in middle level is three (3) minutes to six (6) minutes.
Contestant Evaluation: The ballot must be completely filled out and needs to include the contestant's name and code, the topic, the rank, the percentage score, and the time of the presentation. Judges are to complete their ballots legibly.
Each judge shall rank the participants as 1,2,3, according to the relative merits of the contestants. All other contestants will receive a rank of 4. The judge shall also assign a percentage score ranging from 100 to 75. No two contestants can be given the same percentage.
All point scores must be assigned in whole integers. One hundred percent must be assigned to the best contestant with the points for all other contestants in the range of 99-75. The assignment of a score between 79-75 should be reserved for special circumstances; such as when a contestant fails to complete his or her presentation, exhibits inappropriate behavior, or performs highly inappropriate material.
Critique sheets and ballots must be returned to the ballot collection/tabulation room at the conclusion of each round.
Note: Please follow the instructions given at the judge’s meeting concerning speaking order. Invitational tournaments may draw in round. Regionals & State Finals use the order as listed on the schematic.
▶Impromptu Speakingup to 6:00
Impromptu speaking should develop speakers ability to provide reasoned responses with minimal preparation to a topic. The impromptu speech will reflect knowledge about a general subject area presented in an articulate manner within an organized framework.
Judged on Oral Presentation · Action and Platform Conduct
The full ballot text
Concept of Event: Impromptu speaking should develop speakers ability to provide reasoned responses with minimal preparation to a topic. The impromptu speech will reflect knowledge about a general subject area presented in an articulate manner within an organized framework.
The purpose of this event is to allow the verbalization of individual analysis on a topic of general interest. The emphasis is on the establishment of a position on the topic. Organization is important. The speaker should endeavor to relate to the concepts of the topic. Examples and illustrations from any area of knowledge may be used to highlight the theme of the presentation. A contestant may make notes or a brief outline during the time between receiving the prompt and beginning their presentation. Contestant may speak with or without the use of notes.
Procedure: The MIFA office will supply specific impromptu speaking prompts for regional and state contests. To remove the topic as a variable factor in the decision, all contestants in the same section will speak on the same topic. Topics will be short quotes, editorials, (with a maximum of 150 words), resolutions and/or visual prompts.
Prompts are made available to speakers in the following manner:
1. The sealed envelopes containing the impromptu prompts for each section will be given to the appropriate judge(s) immediately prior to each round. The judge should not open the sealed envelope containing the topic until they are in the competition room.
2. At invitationals, contestants may draw for speaking order. At MIFA Regional and State Final events, contestants perform in the order listed on the schematic. Contestants wait in the hall and at six-minute intervals, report to the competition room in order to take their turn. Contestants should enter only upon a signal from the judge. The only materials a contestant is allowed to bring into the room are writing implements, blank note cards, and/or blank paper. The contestant is not allowed to bring prepared notes, documents, publications, or printed material of any nature into the room. Contestants are to remain in the room after speaking unless otherwise indicated by the tournament director.
3. The judge will open the sealed envelope containing the prompt in the presence of the first contestant. Each student should be given a copy of the prompt at the beginning of their turn. If the tournament director supplies multiple copies of the prompt each contestant should speak from a "fresh" copy of the topic. Timing will begin when the contestant receives the topic from the judge.
4. Six minutes is the suggested total time limit for preparation and speaking for each contestant. Signals for preparation time are at the request of the contestant. There is no minimum speaking time; however, it is conceivable a contestant could speak for most of the six minutes. Timing should begin with the six-minute card and progress downward using MIFA procedures [Speech Activities, Individual Events: Tournament Procedures (Timing)] to zero. Verbal announcements of the total presentation time must be made at the end of the presentation. Presentations, which do not conform to the suggested time parameters, may be penalized at the discretion of the judge.
5. After speaking, each contestant shall return the topic to the judge and must remain in the room to listen to the remaining speakers. It is important, in this situation, that the judge collects the multiple copies of the topic from the contestants prior to allowing the contestants to leave the room. The judge must return all copies of the prompts to the tabulation room with their ballot.
BASIS FOR DECISION
Oral Presentation: The delivery of the speech should be enthusiastic, direct, sincere, and communicative. The speaker should give the impression of genuineness without affectation in attitude, manner, or appearance. The speaker's delivery should be effective in enlisting and holding the interest of the audience. The speaker may deliver the speech from a manuscript, memory, an outline, or any combination thereof.
Action and Platform Conduct: The speaker should exhibit personality, maintain direct eye contact with the audience, show physical poise, and demonstrate freedom in posture, movement, and gesture. Prompting from the audience is not allowed and could be the basis for disqualification.
Timing: Each presentation must be timed. Timing starts when the contestant receives the topic. Either the judge or an alternate timekeeper, under the supervision of the judge, is responsible for using a stopwatch and for displaying time cards that are clearly visible to the contestant unless the performer prefers not to have visual timing. The number showing on the card should indicate the amount of time remaining. Judges should give an oral report of the actual time at the completion of each performance. Timing must be indicated on the ballot as well as on the contestants' critique sheets.
Presentations that do not conform to the suggested time parameters may be penalized at the discretion of the judge. Penalties are not mandatory for timing irregularities.
HIGH SCHOOL: Time limit for Impromptu Speaking in high school is zero (0) minutes to six (6) minutes.
Contestant Evaluation: The ballot must be completely filled out and needs to include the contestant's name and code, the author, the rank, the percentage score, and the time of the presentation. Judges are to complete their ballots legibly. Each judge shall rank the participants as 1,2,3, according to the relative merits of the contestants. All other contestants will receive a rank of 4. The judge shall also assign a percentage score ranging from 100 to 75. No two contestants can be given the same percentage. All point scores must be assigned in whole integers. One hundred percent must be assigned to the best contestant with the points for all other contestants in the range of 99-75. The assignment of a score between 79-75 should be reserved for special circumstances; such as when a contestant fails to complete his or her presentation, exhibits inappropriate behavior, or performs highly inappropriate material. Critique sheets and ballots must be returned to the ballot collection/tabulation room at the conclusion of each round.
Note: Please follow the instructions given at the judge’s meeting concerning speaking order. Invitational tournaments may draw in round. Regional & State Tournaments use the order as listed on the schematic.
Script availability: Contestants must have a script, available for a judge to review in the round if requested. The script may be a hard copy of the original, photocopy of the original, or an electronic version on a device that can be made available to the judge in the round. A judge request for a contestant’s script must be made within the time frame of that round of competition. Should a judge need more extensive review time, the judge should make arrangements through tournament officials and the contestant’s coach.
Introduction/transitional material: Contestants may include an introduction with some remarks descriptive of the work, including plot, themes, mood, setting, character, and/or information about the author(s); such information may be used as transitional material. Introductory and/or transitional material is included in the time limits and may include singing, humming, or other creative approaches.
Clothing: Street attire that suggests mood and character is permissible. Costumes that are unique to the stage, such as period dress and robes, are prohibited.
BASIS OF DECISION
Oral Presentation: Original characterizations are encouraged. Only sound created by the voice and the body of the interpreter is allowed. Mechanical aids or instruments are not permitted. Sound made by unaltered chairs, stools, and/or blox are permitted.
Platform Conduct: The contestant may gesture and move around the platform as necessary. Good interpretation requires total physical, vocal, and emotional involvement. The presentation should not be dominated by choreography, and movement should be appropriate to the theme of the presentation. The use of a manuscript or notes is optional. NO hand props, decorative scripts, lighting, scenery, reader’s stands, benches, platforms, or risers are permitted. ONLY chairs, stools, and blox (BLOX with an X is defined as: An object with a flat base, top and sides, typically square or rectangular) are acceptable. Any physical manipulation using a chair/stool/blox during a round is allowable and permissible.
Suitability of Selection: Selections should reflect a reasonable standard of literature that is appropriate for the level of competition. The selections should be appropriate to the age, temperament, and capabilities of the interpreter. The selection(s) should be of the type that shows insight into human nature and creates an impact on the listener. Editing is permitted, but the author's intent must be preserved. The rewriting of a selection to change the gender of the primary characters is inconsistent with the author's intent and thus is not permitted. In interpretation events, the use of quality literature should be noted favorably, and a selection devoid of literary merit should be scored accordingly.
Timing: Each presentation must be timed. Timing starts when the presentation of the contestant begins. Either the judge or an alternate timekeeper, under the supervision of the judge, is responsible for using a stopwatch and for displaying time cards that are clearly visible to the contestant unless the performer prefers not to have visual timing. The number showing on the card should indicate the amount of time remaining. Judges should give an oral report of the actual time at the completion of each performance. Timing must be indicated on the ballot as well as on the contestants' critique sheets.
Presentations that do not conform to the suggested time parameters may be penalized at the discretion of the judge. Penalties are not mandatory for timing irregularities.
HIGH SCHOOL: Time limit for Dramatic Interpretation in high school is five (5) minutes to eight (8) minutes.
MIDDLE LEVEL: Time limit for Dramatic Interpretation in middle level is four (4) minutes to seven (7) minutes.
Contestant Evaluation: The ballot must be completely filled out and needs to include the contestant's name and code, the author, the rank, the percentage score, and the time of the presentation. Judges are to complete their ballots legibly.
Each judge shall rank the participants as 1,2,3, according to the relative merits of the contestants. All other contestants will receive a rank of 4. The judge shall also assign a percentage score ranging from 100 to 75. No two contestants can be given the same percentage.
All point scores must be assigned in whole integers. One hundred percent must be assigned to the best contestant with the points for all other contestants in the range of 99-75. The assignment of a score between 79-75 should be reserved for special circumstances; such as when a contestant fails to complete his or her presentation, exhibits inappropriate behavior, or performs highly inappropriate material.
Critique sheets and ballots must be returned to the ballot collection/tabulation room at the conclusion of each round.
Note: Please follow the instructions given at the judge’s meeting concerning speaking order. Invitational tournaments may draw in round. Regionals & State Finals use the order as listed on the schematic.
▶↳ Dramatic InterpretationGrades 9–105:00–8:00
Dramatic Interpretation is the presentation of a serious or humorous selection from a play written for either the stage or the electronic media. The cutting may be from a single selection of literature or a compilation. Adaptations of works from other genres (adaptations of poems, novels, or short stories) that are written for performance on the stage or in an electronic medium (radio, film, television) are permitted. In dramatic interpretation, a character developed in depth in a monologue is equally acceptable as a multiple character performance.
Judged on Quality of literature · Physical performance · Vocal performance · Total effect
The full ballot text
Concept of Event: Dramatic Interpretation is the presentation of a serious or humorous selection from a play written for either the stage or the electronic media. The cutting may be from a single selection of literature or a compilation. Adaptations of works from other genres (adaptations of poems, novels, or short stories) that are written for performance on the stage or in an electronic medium (radio, film, television) are permitted. In dramatic interpretation, a character developed in depth in a monologue is equally acceptable as a multiple character performance.
GUIDELINES FOR INTERPRETATION EVENTS
Script availability: Contestants must have a script, available for a judge to review in the round if requested. The script may be a hard copy of the original, photocopy of the original, or an electronic version on a device that can be made available to the judge in the round. A judge request for a contestant’s script must be made within the time frame of that round of competition. Should a judge need more extensive review time, the judge should make arrangements through tournament officials and the contestant’s coach.
Introduction/transitional material: Contestants may include an introduction with some remarks descriptive of the work, including plot, themes, mood, setting, character, and/or information about the author(s); such information may be used as transitional material. Introductory and/or transitional material is included in the time limits and may include singing, humming, or other creative approaches.
Clothing: Street attire that suggests mood and character is permissible. Costumes that are unique to the stage, such as period dress and robes, are prohibited.
BASIS OF DECISION
Oral Presentation: Original characterizations are encouraged. Only sound created by the voice and the body of the interpreter is allowed. Mechanical aids or instruments are not permitted. Sound made by unaltered chairs, stools, and/or blox are permitted.
Platform Conduct: The contestant may gesture and move around the platform as necessary. Good interpretation requires total physical, vocal, and emotional involvement. The presentation should not be dominated by choreography, and movement should be appropriate to the theme of the presentation. The use of a manuscript or notes is optional. NO hand props, decorative scripts, lighting, scenery, reader’s stands, benches, platforms, or risers are permitted. ONLY chairs, stools, and blox (BLOX with an X is defined as: An object with a flat base, top and sides, typically square or rectangular) are acceptable. Any physical manipulation using a chair/stool/blox during a round is allowable and permissible.
Suitability of Selection: Selections should reflect a reasonable standard of literature that is appropriate for the level of competition. The selections should be appropriate to the age, temperament, and capabilities of the interpreter. The selection(s) should be of the type that shows insight into human nature and creates an impact on the listener. Editing is permitted, but the author's intent must be preserved. The rewriting of a selection to change the gender of the primary characters is inconsistent with the author's intent and thus is not permitted. In interpretation events, the use of quality literature should be noted favorably, and a selection devoid of literary merit should be scored accordingly.
Timing: Each presentation must be timed. Timing starts when the presentation of the contestant begins. Either the judge or an alternate timekeeper, under the supervision of the judge, is responsible for using a stopwatch and for displaying time cards that are clearly visible to the contestant unless the performer prefers not to have visual timing. The number showing on the card should indicate the amount of time remaining. Judges should give an oral report of the actual time at the completion of each performance. Timing must be indicated on the ballot as well as on the contestants' critique sheets.
Presentations that do not conform to the suggested time parameters may be penalized at the discretion of the judge. Penalties are not mandatory for timing irregularities.
HIGH SCHOOL: Time limit for Dramatic Interpretation in high school is five (5) minutes to eight (8) minutes.
MIDDLE LEVEL: Time limit for Dramatic Interpretation in middle level is four (4) minutes to seven (7) minutes.
Contestant Evaluation: The ballot must be completely filled out and needs to include the contestant's name and code, the author, the rank, the percentage score, and the time of the presentation. Judges are to complete their ballots legibly.
Each judge shall rank the participants as 1,2,3, according to the relative merits of the contestants. All other contestants will receive a rank of 4. The judge shall also assign a percentage score ranging from 100 to 75. No two contestants can be given the same percentage.
All point scores must be assigned in whole integers. One hundred percent must be assigned to the best contestant with the points for all other contestants in the range of 99-75. The assignment of a score between 79-75 should be reserved for special circumstances; such as when a contestant fails to complete his or her presentation, exhibits inappropriate behavior, or performs highly inappropriate material.
Critique sheets and ballots must be returned to the ballot collection/tabulation room at the conclusion of each round.
Note: Please follow the instructions given at the judge’s meeting concerning speaking order. Invitational tournaments may draw in round. Regionals & State Finals use the order as listed on the schematic.
▶Duo Interpretation7:00–10:00
Duo Interpretation is the presentation by two participants of a single selection of humorous or serious literature from any genre or a selection that combines genres (e.g. drama and prose). The art of interpretation is to be regarded as re-creating believable characters in the selection presented.
Judged on Quality of literature · Physical performance · Vocal performance · Total effect
The full ballot text
Concept of Event: Duo Interpretation is the presentation by two participants of a single selection of humorous or serious literature from any genre or a selection that combines genres (e.g. drama and prose). The art of interpretation is to be regarded as re-creating believable characters in the selection presented.
In Duo Interpretation each of the performers may play one or more characters, so long as performance responsibility in the cutting remains as balanced as possible. Either or both of the performers may also present narration. During the presentation, the contestants must name the author and material source from which the cutting was made.
In Duo Interpretation, direct eye contact and touching are prohibited. Accidental bumping or eye contact that is corrected quickly should not disqualify students from competition. Direct eye contact with the audience is at the discretion of the performers.
A school may change a member of the duo between the regional and state tournament. Duos that compete at State Finals must include at least one original member of the duo that qualified from the regional level.
GUIDELINES FOR INTERPRETATION EVENTS
Script availability: Contestants must have a script, available for a judge to review in the round if requested. The script may be a hard copy of the original, photocopy of the original, or an electronic version on a device that can be made available to the judge in the round. A judge request for a contestant’s script must be made within the time frame of the round of competition. Should a judge need more extensive review time, the judge should make arrangements through tournament officials and the contestant’s coach.
Introduction/transitional material: Contestants may include an introduction with some remarks descriptive of the work, including plot, themes, mood, setting, character, and/or information about the author(s); such information may be used as transitional material. Introductory and/or transitional material is included in the time limits and may include singing, humming, or other creative approaches.
Clothing: Street attire that suggests mood and character is permissible. Costumes that are unique to the stage, such as period dress and robes, are prohibited.
BASIS OF DECISION
Oral Presentation: Original characterizations are encouraged. Only sound created by the voice and the body of the interpreter is allowed. Mechanical aids or instruments are not permitted. Sound made by unaltered chairs, stools, and/or blox are permitted.
Platform Conduct: The contestant may gesture and move around the platform as necessary. Good interpretation requires total physical, vocal, and emotional involvement. The presentation should not be dominated by choreography, and movement should be appropriate to the theme of the presentation. The use of a manuscript or notes is optional. NO hand props, decorative scripts, lighting, scenery, reader’s stands, benches, platforms, or risers are permitted. ONLY chairs, stools, and blox (BLOX with an X is defined as: An object with a flat base, top and sides, typically square or rectangular) are acceptable. Any physical manipulation using a chair/stool/blox during a round is allowable and permissible.
Suitability of Selection: Selections should reflect a reasonable standard of literature that is appropriate for the level of competition. The selections should be appropriate to the age, temperament, and capabilities of the contestant. The selection should be of the type that shows insight into human nature and creates an impact on the listener. Editing is permitted, but the author's intent must be preserved. The rewriting of a selection to change the gender of the primary characters is inconsistent with the author's intent and thus is not permitted. In interpretation events, the use of quality literature should be noted favorably, and a selection devoid of literary merit should be scored accordingly.
Timing: Each presentation must be timed. Timing starts when the contestant begins their presentation. Either the judge or an alternate timekeeper, under the supervision of the judge, is responsible for using a stopwatch and for displaying time cards that are clearly visible to the contestant unless the performer prefers not to have visual timing. The number showing on the card should indicate the amount of time remaining. Judges should give an oral report of the actual time at the completion of each performance. Timing must be indicated on the ballot as well as on the contestants' critique sheets.
Presentations that do not conform to the suggested time parameters may be penalized at the discretion of the judge. Penalties are not mandatory for timing irregularities.
HIGH SCHOOL: Time limit for Duo Interpretation in high school is seven (7) minutes to ten (10) minutes.
MIDDLE LEVEL: Time limit for Duo Interpretation in middle level it is five (5) minutes to eight (8) minutes.
Contestant Evaluation: The ballot must be completely filled out and needs to include the contestant's name and code, the author, the rank, the percentage score, and the time of the presentation. Judges are to complete their ballots legibly.
Each judge shall rank the participants as 1,2,3, according to the relative merits of the contestants. All other contestants will receive a rank of 4. The judge shall also assign a percentage score ranging from 100 to 75. No two contestants can be given the same percentage.
All point scores must be assigned in whole integers. One hundred percent must be assigned to the best contestant with the points for all other contestants in the range of 99-75. The assignment of a score between 79-75 should be reserved for special circumstances; such as when a contestant fails to complete his or her presentation, exhibits inappropriate behavior, or performs highly inappropriate material.
Critique sheets and ballots must be returned to the ballot collection/tabulation room at the conclusion of each round.
Note: Please follow the instructions given at the judge’s meeting concerning speaking order. Invitational tournaments may draw in round. Regionals & State Finals use the order as listed on the schematic.
▶Multiple Interpretation10:00–15:00
Multiple Interpretation is the presentation of a selection of prose, poetry, or drama, or any combination of the genres by three to five participants. Source materials for Multiples alternate between any genre including musical theater/musical film when the State Tournament falls in an odd year and any genre excluding musical theater/musical film in even years. The event is designed to encourage the analysis and performance of selections of literary merit.
Judged on Quality of literature · Physical performance · Vocal performance · Total effect
The full ballot text
Concept of Event: Multiple Interpretation is the presentation of a selection of prose, poetry, or drama, or any combination of the genres by three to five participants. Source materials for Multiples alternate between any genre including musical theater/musical film when the State Tournament falls in an odd year and any genre excluding musical theater/musical film in even years. The event is designed to encourage the analysis and performance of selections of literary merit.
In multiple interpretation, direct eye contact and touching are prohibited. Accidental bumping or eye contact that is corrected quickly should not disqualify students from competition. Direct eye contact with the audience is at the discretion of the performers.
A school may add, delete or change members of a Multiple between the regional and state tournaments. Multiples that compete at State Finals must include at least one original member of the Multiple that qualified from the regional level.
GUIDELINES FOR INTERPRETATION EVENTS
Script availability: Contestants must have a script, available for a judge to review in the round if requested. The script may be a hard copy of the original, photocopy of the original, or an electronic version on a device that can be made available to the judge in the round. A judge request for a contestant’s script must be made within the time frame of that round of competition. Should a judge need more extensive review time, the judge should make arrangements through tournament officials and the contestant’s coach.
Introduction/transitional material: Interpreters may include an introduction with some remarks descriptive of the work, including plot, themes, mood, setting, character, and/or information about the author(s); such information may be used as transitional material. Introductory or transitional material is included in the time limits and may include singing, humming, or other creative approaches.
Clothing: Street attire that suggests mood and character is permissible. Costumes that are unique to the stage, such as period dress and robes, are prohibited.
BASIS OF DECISION
Oral Presentation: Original characterizations are encouraged. Only sound created by the voice and the body of the interpreter is allowed. Mechanical aids or instruments are not permitted. Sound made by unaltered chairs, stools, and/or blox are permitted.
Platform Conduct: The interpreter may gesture and move around the platform as necessary. Good interpretation requires total physical, vocal, and emotional involvement. The presentation should not be dominated by choreography, and movement should be appropriate to the theme of the presentation. The use of a manuscript or notes is optional. NO hand props, decorative scripts, lighting, scenery, reader’s stands, benches, platforms, or risers are permitted. ONLY chairs, stools, and blox (BLOX with an X is defined as: An object with a flat base, top and sides, typically square or rectangular) are acceptable. Any physical manipulation using a chair/stool/blox during a round is allowable and permissible.
Suitability of Selection: Selections should reflect a reasonable standard of literature that is appropriate for the level of competition. The selections should be appropriate to the age, temperament, and capabilities of the interpreter. The selection(s) should be of the type that shows insight into human nature and creates an impact on the listener. Editing is permitted, but the author's intent must be preserved. The rewriting of a selection to change the gender of the primary characters is inconsistent with the author's intent and thus is not permitted. In interpretation events, the use of quality literature should be noted favorably, and a selection devoid of literary merit should be scored accordingly.
Timing: Each presentation must be timed. Timing starts when the presentation of the contestant begins. Either the judge or an alternate timekeeper, under the supervision of the judge, is responsible for using a stopwatch and for displaying time cards that are clearly visible to the contestant unless the performer prefers not to have visual timing. The number showing on the card should indicate the amount of time remaining. Judges should give an oral report of the actual time at the completion of each performance. Timing must be indicated on the ballot as well as on the contestants' critique sheets.
Presentations that do not conform to the suggested time parameters may be penalized at the discretion of the judge. Penalties are not mandatory for timing irregularities.
HIGH SCHOOL: The time limit for Multiple Interpretation in high school is ten minutes to fifteen minutes.
MIDDLE LEVEL: The time limit for Multiple Interpretation in middle level is eight minutes to twelve minutes.
Contestant Evaluation: The ballot must be completely filled out and needs to include the contestant's name and code, the author, the rank, the percentage score, and the time of the presentation. Judges are to complete their ballots legibly.
Each judge shall rank the participants as 1,2,3, according to the relative merits of the contestants. All other contestants will receive a rank of 4. The judge shall also assign a percentage score ranging from 100 to 75. No two contestants can be given the same percentage.
All point scores must be assigned in whole integers. One hundred percent must be assigned to the best contestant with the points for all other contestants in the range of 99-75. The assignment of a score between 79-75 should be reserved for special circumstances; such as when a contestant fails to complete his or her presentation, exhibits inappropriate behavior, or performs highly inappropriate material.
Critique sheets and ballots must be ballot collection/returned to the tabulation room at the conclusion of each round.
Note: Please follow the instructions given at the judge’s meeting concerning speaking order. Some Invitational tournaments may draw in round. Regional & State Tournaments use the order as listed on the schematic.
▶Poetry Interpretation5:00–8:00
Poetry interpretation is the performance of a single poem or a compilation of poems.
Judged on Quality of literature · Physical performance · Vocal performance · Total effect
The full ballot text
Concept of Event: Poetry interpretation is the performance of a single poem or a compilation of poems.
GUIDELINES FOR INTERPRETATION EVENTS
Script availability: Contestants must have a script, available for a judge to review in the round if requested. The script may be a hard copy of the original, photocopy of the original, or an electronic version on a device that can be made available to the judge in the round. A judge request for a contestant’s script must be made within the time frame of the round of competition. Should a judge need more extensive review time, the judge should make arrangements through tournament officials and the contestant’s coach.
Introduction/transitional material: Interpreters will generally wish to include an introduction with some remarks descriptive of the work, including plot, themes, mood, setting, character, and/or information about the author(s); such information may be used as transitional material. Introductory or transitional material is included in the time limits and may include singing, humming, or other creative approaches.
Clothing: Street attire that suggests mood and character is permissible. Costumes that are unique to the stage, such as period dress and robes, are prohibited.
BASIS OF DECISION
Oral Presentation: Original characterizations are encouraged. Only sound created by the voice and the body of the interpreter is allowed. Mechanical aids or instruments are not permitted. Sound made by unaltered chairs, stools, and/or blox are permitted.
Platform Conduct: The interpreter may gesture and move around the platform as necessary. Good interpretation requires total physical, vocal, and emotional involvement. The presentation should not be dominated by choreography, and movement should be appropriate to the theme of the presentation. The use of a manuscript or notes is optional. NO hand props, decorative scripts, lighting, scenery, reader’s stands, benches, platforms, or risers are permitted. ONLY chairs, stools, and blox (BLOX with an X is defined as: An object with a flat base, top and sides, typically square or rectangular) are acceptable. Any physical manipulation using a chair/stool/blox during a round is allowable and permissible.
Suitability of Selection: Selections should reflect a reasonable standard of literature that is appropriate for the level of competition. The selections should be appropriate to the age, temperament, and capabilities of the interpreter. The selection(s) should be of the type that shows insight into human nature and creates an impact on the listener. Editing is permitted, but the author's intent must be preserved. The rewriting of a selection to change the gender of the primary characters is inconsistent with the author's intent and thus is not permitted. In interpretation events, the use of quality literature should be noted favorably, and a selection devoid of literary merit should be scored accordingly.
Timing: Each presentation must be timed. Timing starts when the presentation of the contestant begins. Either the judge or an alternate timekeeper, under the supervision of the judge, is responsible for using a stopwatch and for displaying time cards that are clearly visible to the contestant unless the performer prefers not to have visual timing. The number showing on the card should indicate the amount of time remaining. Judges should give an oral report of the actual time at the completion of each performance. Timing must be indicated on the ballot as well as on the contestants' critique sheets.
Presentations that do not conform to the suggested time parameters may be penalized at the discretion of the judge. Penalties are not mandatory for timing irregularities.
HIGH SCHOOL: Time limit for Poetry Interpretation in high school is five (5) minutes to eight (8) minutes.
MIDDLE LEVEL: Time limit for Poetry Interpretation in middle level is four (4) minutes to seven (7) minutes.
Contestant Evaluation: The ballot must be completely filled out and needs to include the contestant's name and code, the author, the rank, the percentage score, and the time of the presentation. Judges are to complete their ballots legibly.
Each judge shall rank the participants as 1,2,3, according to the relative merits of the contestants. All other contestants will receive a rank of 4. The judge shall also assign a percentage score ranging from 100 to 75. No two contestants can be given the same percentage.
All point scores must be assigned in whole integers. One hundred percent must be assigned to the best contestant with the points for all other contestants in the range of 99-75. The assignment of a score between 79-75 should be reserved for special circumstances; such as when a contestant fails to complete his or her presentation, exhibits inappropriate behavior, or performs highly inappropriate material.
Critique sheets and ballots must be ballot collection/returned to the tabulation room at the conclusion of each round.
Note: Please follow the instructions given at the judge’s meeting concerning speaking order. Some Invitational tournaments may draw in round. Regional & State Tournaments use the order as listed on the schematic.
▶Program Oral Interpretation5:00–8:00
Program Oral Interpretation (POI) is the presentation of multiple selections, sharing a common theme or message, chosen from two or three of the following genres: Prose, Poetry, and/or Dramatic. A minimum of two pieces of literature from at least two separate genres must be used. In order to maintain a focus on the literary concept of the event, contestants must utilize a binder or folder as a part of their performance. Pages, which may contain the manuscript, should be placed within the binder or folder. A binder/folder is not considered a prop, but is limited to one, solid color. Creative use of the binder is allowed and encouraged, but must stay in contact with the contestant at all times. The binder and pages should be used to aid in or clarify transitioning in selections. Pictures and illustrations are considered visual aides and may not be used.
Judged on Quality of literature · Physical performance · Vocal performance · Total effect
The full ballot text
Concept of Event: Program Oral Interpretation (POI) is the presentation of multiple selections, sharing a common theme or message, chosen from two or three of the following genres: Prose, Poetry, and/or Dramatic. A minimum of two pieces of literature from at least two separate genres must be used. In order to maintain a focus on the literary concept of the event, contestants must utilize a binder or folder as a part of their performance. Pages, which may contain the manuscript, should be placed within the binder or folder. A binder/folder is not considered a prop, but is limited to one, solid color. Creative use of the binder is allowed and encouraged, but must stay in contact with the contestant at all times. The binder and pages should be used to aid in or clarify transitioning in selections. Pictures and illustrations are considered visual aides and may not be used.
GUIDELINES FOR INTERPRETATION EVENTS
Script availability: Contestants must have a script, available for a judge to review in the round if requested. The script may be a hard copy of the original, photocopy of the original, or an electronic version on a device that can be made available to the judge in the round. A judge request for a contestant’s script must be made within the time frame of that round of competition. Should a judge need more extensive review time, the judge should make arrangements through tournament officials and the contestant’s coach.
Introduction/transitional material: Contestants may include an introduction with some remarks descriptive of the work, including plot, themes, mood, setting, character, and/or information about the author(s); such information may be used as transitional material. Introductory and/or transitional material is included in the time limits and may include singing, humming, or other creative approaches.
Clothing: Street attire that suggests mood and character is permissible. Costumes that are unique to the stage, such as period dress and robes are prohibited.
BASIS OF DECISION
Oral Presentation: Original characterizations are encouraged. Only sound created by the voice and the body of the interpreter is allowed. Mechanical aids or instruments are not permitted. Sound made by unaltered chairs, stools, binders, and/or blox are permitted.
Platform Conduct: The contestant may gesture and move around the platform as necessary. Good interpretation requires total physical, vocal, and emotional involvement. The presentation should not be dominated by choreography, and movement should be appropriate to the theme of the presentation. NO hand props, decorative scripts, lighting, scenery, reader’s stands, benches, platforms, or risers are permitted. No chairs, stools, or blox may be used in this event.
Suitability of Selection: Even distribution of time between the genres is highly encouraged. Selections should reflect a reasonable standard of literature that is appropriate for the level of competition. The selections should be appropriate to the age, temperament, and capabilities of the interpreter. The selection(s) should be of the type that shows insight into human nature and creates an impact on the listener. Editing is permitted, but the author's intent must be preserved. The rewriting of a selection to change the gender of the primary characters is inconsistent with the author's intent and thus is not permitted. In interpretation events, the use of quality literature should be noted favorably, and a selection devoid of literary merit should be scored accordingly.
Timing: Each presentation must be timed. Timing starts when the presentation of the contestant begins. Either the judge or an alternate timekeeper, under the supervision of the judge, is responsible for using a stopwatch and for displaying time cards that are clearly visible to the contestant unless the performer prefers not to have visual timing. The number showing on the card should indicate the amount of time remaining. Judges should give an oral report of the actual time at the completion of each performance. Timing must be indicated on the ballot as well as on the contestants' critique sheets.
Presentations that do not conform to the suggested time parameters may be penalized at the discretion of the judge. Penalties are not mandatory for timing irregularities.
HIGH SCHOOL: Time limit for Program Oral Interpretation in high school is five (5) minutes to eight (8) minutes.
Contestant Evaluation: The ballot must be completely filled out and needs to include the contestant's name and code, the author, the rank, the percentage score, and the time of the presentation. Judges are to complete their ballots legibly. Each judge shall rank the participants as 1,2,3, according to the relative merits of the contestants. All other contestants will receive a rank of 4. The judge shall also assign a percentage score ranging from 100 to 75. No two contestants can be given the same percentage.
All point scores must be assigned in whole integers. One hundred percent must be assigned to the best contestant with the points for all other contestants in the range of 99-75. The assignment of a score between 79-75 should be reserved for special circumstances; such as when a contestant fails to complete his or her presentation, exhibits inappropriate behavior, or performs highly inappropriate material.
Critique sheets and ballots must be returned to the ballot collection/tabulation room at the conclusion of each round.
Note: Please follow the instructions given at the judge’s meeting concerning speaking order. Invitational tournaments may draw in round. Regionals & State Finals use the order as listed on the schematic.
▶Prose Interpretation5:00–8:00
Prose interpretation is the presentation of a selection from a work of fiction, such as a novel or short story or non-fiction, such as an essay or memoir. The cutting may be from a single selection of literature or a compilation. Either humorous or serious literature is acceptable.
Judged on Quality of literature · Physical performance · Vocal performance · Total effect
The full ballot text
Concept of Event: Prose interpretation is the presentation of a selection from a work of fiction, such as a novel or short story or non-fiction, such as an essay or memoir. The cutting may be from a single selection of literature or a compilation. Either humorous or serious literature is acceptable.
GUIDELINES FOR INTERPRETATION EVENTS
Script availability: Contestants must have a script, with the cuttings indicated, available for a judge to review in the round if requested. The script may be a hard copy of the original, photocopy of the original, or an electronic version on a device that can be made available to the judge in the round. A judge request for a contestant’s script must be made within the time frame of that round of competition. Should a judge need more extensive review time, the judge should make arrangements through tournament officials and the contestant’s coach.
Introduction/transitional material: Interpreters may include an introduction with some remarks descriptive of the work, including plot, themes, mood, setting, character, and/or information about the author(s); such information may be used as transitional material. Introductory or transitional material is included in the time limits and may include singing, humming, or other creative approaches.
Clothing: Street attire that suggests mood and character is permissible. Costumes that are unique to the stage, such as period dress and robes, are prohibited.
BASIS OF DECISION
Oral Presentation: Original characterizations are encouraged. Only sound created by the voice and the body of the interpreter is allowed. Mechanical aids or instruments are not permitted. Sound made by unaltered chairs, stools, and/or blox are permitted.
Platform Conduct: The interpreter may gesture and move around the platform as necessary. Good interpretation requires total physical, vocal, and emotional involvement. The presentation should not be dominated by choreography, and movement should be appropriate to the theme of the presentation. The use of a manuscript or notes is optional. NO hand props, decorative scripts, lighting, scenery, reader’s stands, benches, platforms, or risers are permitted. ONLY chairs, stools, and blox (BLOX with an X is defined as: An object with a flat base, top and sides, typically square or rectangular) are acceptable. Any physical manipulation using a chair/stool/blox during a round is allowable and permissible.
Suitability of Selection: Selections should reflect a reasonable standard of literature that is appropriate for the level of competition. The selections should be adapted to the age, temperament, and capabilities of the interpreter. The selection(s) should be of the type that shows insight into human nature and creates an impact on the listener. Editing is permitted, but the author's intent must be preserved. The rewriting of a selection to change the gender of the primary characters is inconsistent with the author's intent and thus is not permitted. In interpretation events, the use of good literature should be noted favorably, and a selection devoid of literary merit should be scored accordingly.
Timing: Each presentation must be timed. Timing starts when the presentation of the contestant begins. Either the judge or an alternate timekeeper, under the supervision of the judge, is responsible for using a stopwatch and for displaying time cards that are clearly visible to the contestant unless the performer prefers not to have visual timing. The number showing on the card should indicate the amount of time remaining. Judges should give an oral report of the actual time at the completion of each performance. Timing must be indicated on the ballot as well as on the contestants' critique sheets.
Presentations that do not conform to the suggested time parameters may be penalized at the discretion of the judge. Penalties are not mandatory for timing irregularities.
HIGH SCHOOL: Time limit for Prose Interpretation in high school is five (5) minutes to eight (8) minutes.
MIDDLE LEVEL: Time limit for Prose Interpretation in middle level is four (4) minutes to seven (7) minutes.
Contestant Evaluation: The ballot must be completely filled out and needs to include the contestant's name and code, the author, the rank, the percentage score, and the time of the presentation. Judges are to complete their ballots legibly.
Each judge shall rank the participants as 1,2,3, according to the relative merits of the contestants. All other contestants will receive a rank of 4. The judge shall also assign a percentage score ranging from 100 to 75. No two contestants can be given the same percentage.
All point scores must be assigned in whole integers. One hundred percent must be assigned to the best contestant with the points for all other contestants in the range of 99-75. The assignment of a score between 79-75 should be reserved for special circumstances; such as when a contestant fails to complete his or her presentation, exhibits inappropriate behavior, or performs highly inappropriate material.
Critique sheets and ballots must be ballot collection/returned to the tabulation room at the conclusion of each round.
Note: Please follow the instructions given at the judge’s meeting concerning speaking order. Some Invitational tournaments may draw in round. Regional & State Tournaments use the order as listed on the schematic.
▶Storytelling5:00–8:00
Storytelling is the delivery of a single selection or compilation of material suitable for children, including contemporary literature, myths, legends, fairy tales, and folktales. Acceptable selections for storytelling must come from children's literature for any age. The use of manuscripts, notes, or books is permitted.
Judged on Quality of literature · Physical performance · Vocal performance · Total effect
The full ballot text
Concept of Event: Storytelling is the delivery of a single selection or compilation of material suitable for children, including contemporary literature, myths, legends, fairy tales, and folktales. Acceptable selections for storytelling must come from children's literature for any age. The use of manuscripts, notes, or books is permitted.
GUIDELINES FOR INTERPRETATION EVENTS
Script availability: Contestants must have a script, available for a judge to review in the round if requested. The script may be a hard copy of the original, photocopy of the original, or an electronic version on a device that can be made available to the judge in the round. A judge request for a contestant’s script must be made within the time frame of the round of competition. Should a judge need more extensive review time, the judge should make arrangements through tournament officials and the contestant’s coach.
Introduction/transitional material: Contestants may include an introduction with some remarks descriptive of the work, including plot, themes, mood, setting, character, and/or information about the author(s); such information may be used as transitional material. Introductory or transitional material is included in the time limits and may include singing, humming, or other creative approaches.
Clothing: Street attire that suggests mood and character is permissible. Costumes that are unique to the stage, such as period dress and robes, are prohibited.
BASIS OF DECISION
Oral Presentation: Original characterizations are encouraged. Only sound created by the voice and the body of the interpreter is allowed. Mechanical aids or instruments are not permitted. Sound made by unaltered chairs, stools, and/or blox are permitted.
Platform Conduct: The interpreter may gesture and move around the platform as necessary. Good interpretation requires total physical, vocal, and emotional involvement. The presentation should not be dominated by choreography, and movement should be appropriate to the theme of the presentation. The use of a manuscript or notes is permitted. NO hand props, decorative scripts, lighting, scenery, reader’s stands, benches, platforms, or risers are permitted. ONLY chairs, stools, and blox (BLOX with an X is defined as: An object with a flat base, top and sides, typically square or rectangular) are acceptable. Any physical manipulation using a chair/stool/blox during a round is allowable and permissible.
Suitability of Selection: Selections should reflect a reasonable standard of literature that is appropriate for the level of competition. The selections should be appropriate to the age, temperament, and capabilities of the interpreter. The selection(s) should be of the type that shows insight into human nature and creates an impact on the listener. Editing is permitted, but the author's intent must be preserved. The rewriting of a selection to change the gender of the primary characters is inconsistent with the author's intent and thus is not permitted. In interpretation events, the use of quality literature should be noted favorably, and a selection devoid of literary merit should be scored accordingly.
Timing: Each presentation must be timed. Timing starts when the presentation of the contestant begins. Either the judge or an alternate timekeeper, under the supervision of the judge, is responsible for using a stopwatch and for displaying time cards that are clearly visible to the contestant unless the performer prefers not to have visual timing. The number showing on the card should indicate the amount of time remaining. Judges should give an oral report of the actual time at the completion of each performance. Timing must be indicated on the ballot as well as on the contestants' critique sheets.
Presentations that do not conform to the suggested time parameters may be penalized at the discretion of the judge. Penalties are not mandatory for timing irregularities.
HIGH SCHOOL: TIME LIMIT for Storytelling in high school is five (5) minutes to eight (8) minutes.
MIDDLE LEVEL: TIME LIMIT for Storytelling in middle level is four (4) minutes to seven (7) minutes.
Contestant Evaluation: The ballot must be completely filled out and needs to include the contestant's name and code, the author, the rank, the percentage score, and the time of the presentation. Judges are to complete their ballots legibly.
Each judge shall rank the participants as 1,2,3, according to the relative merits of the contestants. All other contestants will receive a rank of 4. The judge shall also assign a percentage score ranging from 100 to 75. No two contestants can be given the same percentage.
All point scores must be assigned in whole integers. One hundred percent must be assigned to the best contestant with the points for all other contestants in the range of 99-75. The assignment of a score between 79-75 should be reserved for special circumstances; such as when a contestant fails to complete his or her presentation, exhibits inappropriate behavior, or performs highly inappropriate material.
Critique sheets and ballots must be returned to the ballot collection/tabulation room at the conclusion of each round.
Note: Please follow the instructions given at the judge’s meeting concerning speaking order. Some Invitational tournaments may draw in round. Regional & State Tournaments use the order as listed on the schematic.
Judged on Cross-examination · Answering the speaker before you · Building your own case · Evidence and reasoning · Delivery
The full ballot text
Speaker A opens with a 2½-minute Pro. Every speaker after takes 2 minutes of prep and 2 minutes of cross-examination of the speaker before them, in whichever order they choose, then speaks for 5 minutes: about 2½ minutes of Con against that speaker’s Pro, then about 2½ minutes of their own Pro. When the last speaker has given their Pro, Speaker A takes their prep and cross-examination against them and closes with a 2½-minute Con.
Debaters should flow every round. They may cross-apply arguments and evidence other debaters have presented. Most come with one well-developed Pro contention and several prepared Con contentions.
▶Public Forum
Teams of two debate the resolution, one side Pro and one Con. Before every round a coin is tossed: the team that wins chooses EITHER its side OR whether it speaks first or second, and the other team makes the remaining choice. The judge decides the round only on what is said in it — an argument a team does not answer is conceded — and writes a reason for the decision.
The round, in order: first speaker of Team A, constructive (4 minutes); first speaker of Team B, constructive (4); crossfire (3); second speaker of Team A, rebuttal (4); second speaker of Team B, rebuttal (4); crossfire (3); first speaker of Team A, summary (3); first speaker of Team B, summary (3); grand crossfire, all four debaters (3); second speaker of Team A, final focus (2); second speaker of Team B, final focus (2). Each team has 3 minutes of prep to use during the round.
Debaters may bring new evidence for an argument already made in the summary and final focus, but no brand-new arguments. In crossfire they take turns asking and answering.
Speaker points run from 26 to 30 in half points. No two debaters in a room may get the same points, and the winning team must get the same or more points in total than the losing team.
